![dell wireless 1705 driver 5.0ghz dell wireless 1705 driver 5.0ghz](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-OW6atuLOo0E/VCJYlRQaivI/AAAAAAAAAWQ/Ya94RktrikY/s1600/Dell%2BInspiron%2B3537.jpg)
#DELL WIRELESS 1705 DRIVER 5.0GHZ DOWNLOAD#
The download speed is not the greatest, which is a little odd as it can upload so fast. This has been my favourite card especially when I only used 2.4Ghz, where the upload speed is simply phenominal, no card come remotely close to it. No excuse for the lack luster 2.4Ghz performance (most 11n routers are 2.4Ghz only) where Intel crippled the card with no channel bonding (40Mhz)Ģ.4Ghz Download = 31secs = 9.63MB/s = 77.0Mbps (27% of 300Mbps)Ģ.4Ghz Upload = 15secs = 19.90MB/s = 159.2Mbps (54% of 300Mbps)Ģ.4Ghz Download = 30secs (28% of 300Mbps) The i4965 now is the fastest uploader in 5Ghz, ans 2nd equal in downloading, this is much more like it. I would recommend that folk use this driver as it fixes an Authentication issue that stopped the Card from connecting to router in 11n mode (20Mhz or 40Mhz) at least with my Marvell based Chipet set router. This driver fixed the previous 5Ghz 11n connection problem, I was now able to do a proper 11n test :) also the 2.4Ghz download speed was dramatically improved. Luckily for Intel they released a new driver and I found it over at Gigabyte (and now host at ) My other i3945 card works with channels 36-64 and all the higher channels so no issue there.īut buyers beware there are channel locked devices out there, but then who would buy one today ? This card is a weird one, as it has 5Ghz channels 36-48(or possibly 64) disabled, so only the higher channels can be used.īut there are very few Wireless routers that broadcast the higher channels, rendering this cad pretty useless for 5Ghz testing.
![dell wireless 1705 driver 5.0ghz dell wireless 1705 driver 5.0ghz](https://www.sysnapse.com/image/sysnapse/image/data/all_product_images/product-43576/X9JDY.jpg)
Here goes not my original card (in my Wife Notebook) but a i3945 from a Toshiba A100 This test will need to wait till I get a newer Notebook to try it on.Ģ.4Ghz Download 150secs = 1.99MB/s = 15.9Mbps (38% of 54Mbps)Ģ.4Ghz Upload 118secs = 2.53MB/s = 20.2Mbps (43% of 54Mbps) The card with the most potential with 3x3 antenna setup, but alas on both my i945 chipsets the driver wouldn't start in all the OS's I tried. Intel 5300 Driver wouldn't start = No Result. Would love to see how the newer versions of this card go.Ĭlient utility is a little naff, as you cannot do much with it. It's one of the first 11n WLAN cards released and it did rather well with both 2.4 and 5Ghz tests. This card was the biggest surprise for me. Once I connected at 135Mbps (20Mhz channel width) the card behaved much better and performed more like it brother above. This card has been very unreliable, I hope it's just the card that I have.ġ1n testing was very hard as it would hardly perform any file transfer (would have taken hours to complete test with 300Mbps connection) This was my first sample WLAN card I was send by OxfordTEC direct from SparkLAN in Taiwan. Once i found a fix for this, the card did well. Gave me some early issues with the now Infamous NMI/Parity error. The Atheros 5008 based card was the best at the time (or so I thought)
#DELL WIRELESS 1705 DRIVER 5.0GHZ UPDATE#
This was the first WLAN I bought for my i9400 to update the i3945 that came with the machine. Transferring a file (312,928,648 bytes) over WLAN, whose best.